Time Magazine Reporter Needs a Math Lesson

It’s amazing how people can use any kind of number to make their point, even in an established media outlet. Joe Klein wrote “Obamacare: Mend it, Don’t End it” in Time magazine, and since it’s a major publication that’s been around for a while, you’d expect to read solid information that backs up his opinion.
However, he seems to see numbers his own “special” way, since they don’t really add up. He defends the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and says it’s running pretty well, then uses a poll to prove his point:
“The word of mouth seems to be … not bad: a recent ABC News–Washington Post poll actually had more Americans in favor of Obamacare than opposed to it, by an overpowering 49% to 48%.”
Overpowering? It’s been a while since I’ve had math, but even I can see that 49 percent is barely different than 48. It’s just a difference of one percentage point, which doesn’t match the definition of “overpowering”. Even though he’s writing an editorial, not a straight news piece, he’s entitled to his opinion, but his argument becomes weak with those numbers that are barely different.
Later on, though, he’s more accurate when he says, “A recent Kaiser family foundation poll shows that 59% of Americans want to see this program improved…” That sounds more “overwhelming” than the other percentage he gave to prove a point that wasn’t really proven.

Joe Klein is an experienced journalist, and the fact that he’s twisted information to try to support his ideas is a lesson for anyone. If you want to use statistics or polls to support your position, make sure you’re using solid information that truly matches what you want to say. Otherwise, it can negatively affect your reputation. In Klein’s case, he seems to be doing fine, but most people shouldn’t take such a chance. What you say should be solid and helpful.

Lady in the Banana Peal Suit Slips Up in Court

It’s not so ap-pealing: Catherine Conrad, aka the “Banana Lady”, has slipped up after filing several lawsuits for copyright infringement. Kim Janssen, who’s a Federal Courts Reporter for the Sun-Times, says after Conrad has performed with her puppet monkey and has done “The Banana Shake” for various groups, she’s sued because people have used her image or have posted videos of her online.

However, her latest litigious effort has failed at the U.S.“Appeals Court. She sued several credit unions after people posted videos of her on Facebook. The judge said she doesn’t own the copyright of her banana costume because it’s “a common consumer product” and said her lawsuit is an “abuse of the legal process”.
Not only are her legal actions obviously frivolous, but she doesn’t seem to understand publicity, either. Hopefully the judge’s decision will prevent other lawsuits, and hopefully she’ll learn some publicity lessons because she’s missed a basic concept. It’s helpful when people organically share what someone is doing because it can result in more positive exposure for the person. However, by not letting people share her image and videos, Conrad is cutting off a natural marketing plan, and she’s only getting negative publicity for all the lawsuits she’s filed.

By the way, what’s interesting about this case is that her attorney’s name wasn’t in the story, probably because he or she doesn’t want to slip on the Banana Lady’s rotten peel.